Trust & Transparency Center

Why Trust
LongevLife

Evidence-Based Longevity Intelligence Built on Scientific Transparency

Every clinical claim is linked to a verified source. Every source can be independently checked. This is not a marketing promise, but a measurable standard.

Explore Our Research Standards ←
EVIDENCE BASE LAST VERIFIED · JUNE 2026
By the numbers

A trust record you can audit.

Every number here is counted directly from the knowledge base, not estimated and not rounded in our favor.

DOI-verified studies🔗
0
Studies with a verifiable DOI · unique, independently checkable
Source citations📚
0
Source citations across the corpus
Articles reviewed📝
0+
Edited research articles
Pages maintained🗂️
0+
Content pages in the knowledge base
Languages🌐
0
Hebrew and English, fully aligned
Last database update🕑
June 2026
Last update and verification of the evidence base
How our research is built

From PubMed to publication.

Every content item passes through the same fixed pipeline. No shortcuts, and no publishing without the source.

🔍
01
PubMed
⚗️
02
Evidence screening
📊
03
Quality assessment
🧠
04
AI Scientist
✍️
05
Editorial review
✅
06
Publication
Evidence hierarchy

We weight evidence by its strength.

Not every study is equal. We prioritize the top of the pyramid: meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials.

Meta-analysis Meta-analysis
Systematic reviews Systematic reviews
Randomized trials Randomized trials
Cohort studies Cohort studies
Case reports Case reports
Expert opinion Expert opinion
◆ Prioritized by LongevLife
Expert opinion is used only for context, never as the sole basis for a clinical claim.
Editorial principles

The rules we hold ourselves to.

🚫

No fabricated studies

We do not fabricate studies, data, or citations. Ever.

Editorial Policy →
🔗

Every clinical claim needs a DOI

A clinical claim without a verified source is not published.

Evidence Standards →
📋

Transparent corrections

Corrections are recorded openly, not quietly deleted.

Review Process →
⚖️

Evidence vs opinion

We explicitly distinguish between established evidence and interpretation.

Methodology →
🩺

Medical disclaimer

Educational content, not a substitute for personal medical advice.

Disclaimer →
🤝

Conflict-of-interest disclosure

Conflicts of interest are disclosed transparently.

Disclosure →
Our evidence base

The journals behind the claims.

These are journals actually cited in our evidence base, with a DOI for each source. Every citation can be independently verified on PubMed.

Peer-reviewed, PubMed-indexed sources
Peer-reviewed sources, indexed in PubMed
86 DOI-VERIFIED · 197 CITATIONS
NEJM JAMA Science Nature Communications Cell Metabolism The BMJ PNAS Lancet Psychiatry Diabetes Care JAMA Internal Medicine Experimental Gerontology Nutrients
Every name here appears in a real citation with a DOI within the knowledge base. The list is not exhaustive.
Quality control

What keeps the standard honest.

Our quality control is rules, not promises. These are the checks every content item must pass.

✓
Every clinical claim is DOI-linked
86 unique verified sources, independently checkable.
✓
Evidence is graded, not assumed
Every finding is ranked by evidence strength in the pyramid.
✓
Corrections are logged, not hidden
Corrections are documented in the public review process.
✓
Bilingual parity
Verified content is identical in Hebrew and English.
✓
Human editorial review
AI output undergoes human editing before publication.
✓
Continuous re-verification
The evidence base is reviewed and updated, last: June 2026.
The difference, by practice

Standards, not adjectives.

This comparison is about verifiable procedures, not superlatives.

Practice LongevLife Generic health sites Blogs AI chatbots
DOI on every claim✓partial✕✕
Evidence hierarchy applied✓✕✕varies
Human editorial review✓partial✕✕
Published corrections policy✓partial✕✕
Source transparency✓partial✕✕
Evidence vs opinion separated✓✕✕✕
Public commitments

What we promise, in writing.

We never fabricate studies
We will not fabricate studies, numbers, or citations under any circumstances.
We link every claim
Every clinical claim leads to a verified source.
We publish corrections
When we err, we correct openly and document it.
We distinguish evidence from opinion
It is always clear what is evidence-based and what is interpretation.
We disclose limitations
We explicitly note where the evidence is weak or partial.
We point you to your physician
Medical decisions are discussed with a doctor, not made here.
Transparency

Read the policies for yourself.

Editorial Policy→ Research Methodology→ Evidence Standards→ Review & Corrections→ Research Sources→ Medical Disclaimer→ Intellectual Property→ Legal & Privacy→

© 2025-2026 LongevLife Educational content only, not a substitute for personalized medical advice. Evidence base last verified June 2026. Every figure on this page is counted directly from the live knowledge base.